Assault

Published on: May 4, 2026

Carroll County Man Arrested in Restaurant Shooting

Maryland State Police recently arrested a 52-year-old Carroll County man in connection with a shooting outside of a crowded Eldersburg restaurant. The shooting occurred at roughly 9:30 p.m. on a Friday night, and when troopers responded they observed two men suffering from gunshot wounds. The two victims, a 60-year-old man and a 50-year-old man were transported to a trauma center for medical treatment. Troopers also located a suspect in the shooting, who was arrested on the scene without incident. According to the MSP press release, troopers learned that there was an altercation behind the restaurant in question, and that the three involved individuals all knew each other. A firearm was recovered on the scene in glove compartment of the defendant’s golf cart and processed into evidence.

Troopers consulted with the State’s Attorney’s Office for Carroll County and made the decision to charge the suspect with two counts of first degree assault, one count of firearm use in a crime of violence and one count of wearing a handgun while under the influence. This case is unique because the defendant held a valid Maryland Wear and Carry license. Most gun crimes, especially violent crimes, are committed by those who do not have a permit. In fact, many defendants in violent gun crimes are also prohibited from possessing a firearm due to prior criminal convictions or being under the age of 21. The charge of wearing a handgun while under the influence can only be charged when a defendant possesses a valid Maryland permit to wear or carry. This offense is listed under the Public Safety Code in section 5-314. A violation of this offense carries up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine. A conviction or a probation before judgment to this offense will also likely trigger permit suspension or revocation proceedings initiated by the Maryland State Police. Obviously in this case the defendant has bigger issues to deal with; assault in the first degree carries up to 25 years in prison and use of a firearm in a crime of violence carries a 5-year mandatory prison sentence.

From a review of the statement of charges documents it certainly appears this will be a self-defense case. The defendant allegedly told law enforcement that he shot one individual after being choked and was unaware that he shot the other individual. Surveillance camera footage from the restaurant’s back parking lot apparently showed one of the gunshot victims initiating the physical altercation by bear hugging the defendant. Customers in the restaurant were interviewed and reportedly told troopers that the defendant was acting belligerently and that the three individuals left the restaurant to engage in a physical altercation. Most gunshot cases are charged as attempted murder, but based on the charging document it is clear that the State made the correct call in not requesting this charge. Regardless, two counts of first-degree assault and the use of a firearm in a crime of violence present a significant risk for the defendant if the case goes to trial. The defendant was unsurprisingly held without bail by a District Court judge, though he will have a much better shot at release in the Circuit Court.

Continue reading →

Published on: September 19, 2024

State Police Arrest Woman in Armed Road Rage

By Benjamin Herbst

Maryland State Police troopers recently arrested a woman for allegedly pointing a gun from her BMW SUV at another motorist in Prince George’s County. The 37-year-old woman was arrested at her home the day after the alleged road-rage incident and charged with two counts of first-degree assault, one count of second-degree assault, use of a firearm in a crime of violence and loaded handgun in vehicle. She was held without bail by a District Court Commissioner but granted release on private home detention at her bail review in front of a judge. According to the MSP press release the woman allegedly pointed a firearm at another driver on Route 5 in PG County. The other driver apparently had a child in the vehicle at the time of the incident. Law enforcement officers were able to locate the suspect’s vehicle at her residence later that day and seized two loaded handguns from the BMW. MSP also stated that the woman attempted to destroy evidence by smashing her cell phone during a police interview, though she was not charged with obstruction of justice or tampering with evidence.

The defendant is set for a preliminary hearing in October at the Upper Marlboro District Courthouse. The preliminary hearing will likely not occur, as they rarely do in Prince George’s County. The State will likely nolle pros. the case on the preliminary date and then indict the matter in the circuit court. It does not appear that the defendant has any prior convictions in Maryland, so her defense lawyer may be able to argue for the felony assault to be dropped assuming the State can prove its case. The defendant must also focus on the charge for use of a firearm in a crime of violence, which is classified as a misdemeanor but carries a harsh 5-year mandatory sentence and a 20-year maximum penalty. The State and eventually the judge will certainly be concerned about the presence of firearms on a public highway and the fact that a child was inside the victim’s car. There may not be any direct proof that the gun was loaded at the time of the alleged assault, though the State may be able to establish this based on circumstantial evidence that it was loaded at the time police executed the search and seizure.

Under Maryland law a person can be charged with felony first-degree assault for causing or attempting to cause serious physical injury, strangling another person or committing an assault with a firearm. In firearm cases like this one, the defendant does not have to discharge the gun or use it to strike the victim to be charged. The only requirement is that the defendant commit a simple assault with a firearm, which can be any act that places the victim in fear of immediate harm. If you have been charged or are being investigated for assault or use of a firearm, contact Maryland gun crimes attorney Benjamin Herbst anytime for a free consultation. Benjamin specializes in aggravated assault with a firearm, domestic assault, possession of a firearm by a disqualified person or convicted felon and use of a handgun in a crime. He is available on short notice for bail reviews in all Maryland counties and can file a motion to recall your arrest warrant or bench warrant if you have missed court. Contact Benjamin 7 days a week at 410-207-2598 and learn what defenses may be available in your Maryland gun charge.

Continue reading →

Published on: June 14, 2024

State Police Arrest Ohio Man for Brandishing Paintball Gun

By Benjamin Herbst

The Maryland State Police recently reported the arrest of a 39-year-old Ohio man after an alleged road rage incident on I-70 in Howard County. According to the MSP press release a man called 9-1-1 to report that another motorist pointed a firearm in his direction while traveling westbound on I-70 in Western Howard County. The alleged victim was able to provide a description of the vehicle and the license plate number. Troopers eventually located the suspect’s vehicle traveling through Frederick and initiated a traffic stop. During the traffic stop the driver admitted to officers that he pointed a paintball pistol at the victim and provided said pistol to the the troopers. The man was arrested on the scene. Troopers then consulted with the Howard County State’s Attorney’s Office to determine the appropriate charges and were informed that a felony assault was appropriate under the circumstances.

The Ohio man was also charged with three additional misdemeanors for assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment and disorderly conduct. He was taken to the Howard County Department of Corrections in Jessup where he was later released by a District Court Commissioner on a $10,000 unsecured bail. He does not have a trial date yet because the District Court does not have jurisdiction over the felony assault. The State will have to indict the defendant or file a criminal information in the Circuit Court for Howard County if they remain committed to pursuing the felony. Otherwise, the case will be set for trial in the district court in Ellicott City.

The decision to charge the man with first-degree assault is curious to say the least. Under Maryland criminal law 3-202 felony assault in the first degree is defined as intentionally causing or attempting to cause serious physical injury to another, committing an assault with a firearm or intentionally strangling another. A paintball gun does not meet the definition of a firearm under the criminal code or the public safety code as the paintballs are ejected by compressed air rather than an explosive such as gun powder. The same is true for BB guns and other air guns, which are considered dangerous weapons but not firearms. Obviously, there was no strangulation in this case, so the State would have to believe it can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant attempted to cause serious physical injury to the victim in order to support the felony first-degree assault charge. While the MSP press release did not specifically state what happened during the alleged road rage, there likely must have been some testimony from the victim that the defendant used his vehicle in an overly aggressive manner. We have seen numerous cases where a driver is charged with first-degree assault for attempting to hit a person with his or her vehicle, and a moving vehicle can clearly cause serious bodily injury if used as a weapon. The State could potentially have a case under these circumstances, though a lesser charge is likely more appropriate under these.

Continue reading →

Published on: May 21, 2024

Arrest Made after Alleged Assault on Officer, High Speed Chase

By Benjamin Herbst

Carroll County Deputy Sheriffs recently arrested multiple individuals after an investigation of an alleged retail burglary turned into a multi-jurisdictional high-speed chase. The incident began when a concerned citizen called police upon observing a suspicious U-Haul van that was parked at a residence in Westminster. The van’s registration plate was apparently covered by a piece of cardboard. Officers were unable to immediately locate the vehicle, though a short time later it was observed in a retail store parking lot where several individuals were seen walking from the area of the vehicle to and from the store. Police surveilled the vehicle and the individuals and then decided to pursue the van as it pulled out of the store parking lot. A traffic stop was initiated, and officers ordered the driver out of the vehicle, but he allegedly refused and sped away. As the driver, a 56-year-old man from Baltimore, drove off he allegedly struck a deputy sheriff on the arm with his vehicle.

Deputies initially chased the van as it weaved in an out of traffic, allegedly reaching speeds of over 90 miles per hour. At some point the chase was terminated due to safety concerns for the public and the officers. Baltimore County Police was notified that the van was headed toward its jurisdiction and provided air support to locate the vehicle. Air support by way of helicopter is not always available in the event of a terminated high-speed chase, but due to the allegation of a felony assault on an officer the helicopter team jumped into action. The driver of the vehicle was ultimately detained and arrested in Baltimore City, and then transported to the Carroll County Detention Center. He was charged with resisting arrest, 4^th degree burglary, assault in the second degree and assault in the first degree. A District Court Commissioner held the defendant without bail at his initial appearance, and a judge ordered the same during bail review. His next court appearance is scheduled for mid-June, though this preliminary hearing will likely be cancelled in favor of an indictment or information filed with the Circuit Court.

The defendant also faces a slew of traffic infractions for fleeing, running a red light, negligent and reckless driving, and multiple speeding tickets. Two other individuals were charged in the incident, but with less serious charges than the driver of the van. One was charged with 4^thdegree burglary and released by the commissioner shortly after his arrest. The other was charged with 4^th degree burglary and fraudulent personal identification to avoid prosecution under Maryland code 8-301. This offense, which carries up to 1 year in jail, is often charged with false statement to an officer, though false statement to an officer carries a 6-month maximum penalty under 9-501. The false statement cost the defendant a night of freedom, as he was held without bail by the commissioner and released by a judge the next day.

Continue reading →

Published on: February 9, 2024

Maryland Man Arrested for Assaulting Loss Prevention Officer

By Benjamin Herbst

Montgomery County Police recently arrested a 31-year-old Hyattsville man after responding to a call for an armed robbery at a Safeway in Kensington. According to police the man and an 18-year-old co-defendant attempted to steal merchandise from the store but were confronted by a loss prevention officer or LPO. The LPO apparently tried to recover the merchandise from the thieves when the older male defendant pulled out a knife. During the scuffle the LPO was cut on his chest and transported to a nearby hospital. Most large retail stores have at least one loss prevention officer always working, and some stores like Target, Walmart, Home Depot and Lowes have numerous LPOs walking the retail floor and monitoring surveillance cameras in the security office. Loss prevention officers do not have the express power to arrest or detain individuals, but they can file charging documents on behalf of the store. Typically, LPOs call the police when they observe a suspected shoplifting case, and the officer who arrives on scene issues a criminal citation or files charges with a District Court Commissioner.

The LPO in this case was treated for non-life-threatening injuries, which likely means he did not receive a deep puncture wound that is common in stabbings. Police did not provide a detailed description of the injuries though based on the facts he may have been cut in a slicing type of motion and suffered a laceration. The defendant was charged with first degree assault, second degree assault, theft and false statement to a law enforcement officer. He was initially held without bail by the commissioner but released on an unsecured bail the next day at his district court bail review. The fact that a judge released the defendant tells us that he may not have intended to stab or even cut the victim. It also likely means that the defendant does not have a history of violent crime or other criminal offenses. This case is his only case in Maryland visible to the public, which leads to the conclusion that he has no prior convictions in the state. The defendant has a preliminary hearing scheduled for March 1 at the District Court in Rockville, though the State’s Attorney’s Office will make a decision about whether to file felony charges earlier than the preliminary. To prove assault in the first degree the State must prove the defendant intended to cause serious bodily injury, as the actual injures here were not life-threatening or permanent. Based on the defendant’s bail status the first-degree assault is likely a borderline proposition for the State, but we would not be surprised if they indicted him and then let it play out in circuit court.

The Blog will continue to follow this case and may post a follow up article in the future. If you or a loved one has been charged or is being investigated for an adult or juvenile crime in state or federal court, contact Maryland assault lawyer Benjamin Herbst anytime for a free consultation. Benjamin specializes in domestic violence cases such as assault by strangulation, false imprisonment and protective order violations. He is also a skilled gun crime lawyer who handles assault with a firearm, which is considered a felony regardless of whether the gun was fired or otherwise caused actual physical harm. Simply brandishing a gun in a threatening manner can result in felony assault under Maryland law. Finally, if you have been charged with theft or theft scheme Benjamin will fight to have your charges dismissed or reduced. Typically, when there is a theft and an assault the defendant will also face robbery charges, but this case presents yet another unique set of facts in the criminal justice system.

Continue reading →

Published on: May 17, 2023

Salisbury Man Sentenced to 15 Years for Assault

By Benjamin Herbst

Back in February a Wicomico County jury found a 49-year-old man guilty of assault in the first and second degree and an additional count of reckless endangerment. The domestically related incident occurred last summer, but the case was not closed until a recent sentencing hearing. According to facts presented at trial the defendant and the victim began arguing while traveling in the victim’s vehicle. The argument then turned physical when the pair arrived at the victim’s residence, and at one point victim lost consciousness while being assaulted. Testimony from the victim revealed that when she regained consciousness the defendant had his hands around her neck, thus triggering first degree assault charges based on strangulation. Trial lasted two days at the Circuit Court for Wicomico County in Salisbury, and then sentencing was postponed until May after the jury announced its verdict.

Delayed sentencing hearings are commonplace in most jury trials, especially violent felony cases where a conviction typically leads to a prison sentence. The delay allows the state and defense to prepare for sentencing as well as for the judge to order a pre-sentence investigation or PSI. In this particular case the judge handed down a 15-year prison sentence on the first-degree assault charge, which carries a maximum penalty of 25 years. The other counts of assault second degree and reckless endangerment merged into the 15-year sentence. Based on the fact that first degree assault is defined as a crime of violence, the defendant will have to serve at least 7.5 years before he is eligible for parole. The defendant, who filed an appeal shortly after being sentenced, also faces an additional 3-years for a probation violation that is scheduled for sentencing in June. The defendant is on probation in Wicomico County for a second-degree assault charge from that occurred in 2018, but was resolved in 2019. Considering the defendant was given a straight 15-year sentence (no probation) on the felony assault, his probation will likely be revoked. The only thing left to determine is whether the back-up time will be concurrent or consecutive to his new sentence.

Upon first glance, 15 years in prison may seem like an overly harsh sentence for a case where there was no weapon used and seemingly no allegation of permanent injury to the victim. On the other hand, the defendant was already on probation for an assault, and has an extensive criminal history including at least three prior assault convictions. Factoring in prior probation violations and his criminal record the defendant likely qualified as a major offender under the Maryland Sentencing Guidelines. Therefore, his guidelines range for first degree assault with a minor victim injury would be 10 to 20 years of incarceration, and it looks like the judge gave him a sentence right in the middle of the guidelines. First degree assault carries a harsh sentence under Maryland law, as the guidelines ranges are significantly higher than second degree assault. The Blog may post a follow up article after this individual appears at this violation of probation hearing, and again if his appeal ends up being successful.

Continue reading →

Published on: April 5, 2023

Six Juveniles Arrested for Carjacking, Firearm Possession

By Benjamin Herbst

Over the past week Prince George’s County Police officers arrested six boys in connection with two separate carjacking incidents. The boys were also charged with illegal firearm possession after police located ghost guns in their possession. The first arrest occurred at the end of last week when police located a vehicle that had been carjacked three days earlier. After making a felony traffic stop, officers located four teenaged boys from Washington D.C. inside the vehicle and also recovered a loaded ghost gun. All four were arrested and charged with multiple serious crimes, though it appears they will be charged as juveniles due to the fact that they were 15 at the time of the incident. It is unclear whether the juveniles were released to their parents or remain detained at a secure juvenile facility.

The four boys will cclappear at the Prince George’s County Circuit Court for their respective trials. While the cases will start out in the juvenile court, the State may choose to seek a discretionary waiver for some or all of the juveniles. Maryland law allows a judge to order the transfer of a case to adult court for a 15-year-old defendant if a finding is made that the child is not fit for juvenile rehabilitative measures. A child under 15 can only be prosecuted in adult court for an offense such as murder that carries life in prison. Juvenile discretionary waivers are rare, and in all likelihood would not be utilized for a carjacking case unless the juvenile has an extensive history of violence. Carjacking by definition is a serious offense, but if the facts are especially egregious the Court certainly could consider a discretionary waiver.

Just four days later Prince George’s County officers made yet another carjacking arrest. The suspects in this case were also juveniles, with one being a 16-year-old from Fort Washington, and the other a 17-year-old from Temple Hills. Police received a call for an attempted armed carjacking on April 3 at around 1:30 p.m. in District Heights. When officers arrived, they observed two suspects running from the scene and were ultimately able to take them into custody. Search incident to arrest revealed that both juveniles were in possession of loaded ghost guns. In the first three months of 2023 alone 32 juveniles and 19 adults have been arrested for carjacking in Prince George’s County. This alarming trend

Continue reading →

Published on: June 10, 2022

New Yorker Arrested for DUI and Assault on Ocean City Officer

By Benjamin Herbst

Memorial Day weekend marks the unofficial start to the summer season in Maryland’s only beach town, but these days tourists from the region begin traveling to Ocean City to attend events and enjoy the night life as soon as the weather turns warm. With graduations completed and school about to let out, it’s safe to say that summer is now in full swing down at the ocean. This being a criminal law Blog we’re not here to report on the calendar of events in OCMD, but rather the host of new arrests and police activity that comes with the dramatic uptick in visitors. This week one notable arrest took place after a New York man was pulled over for multiple traffic infractions including aggressive driving, and traveling roughly twice the 35 miles per hour speed limit on the Philadelphia Ave. section of coastal highway. This area is one of the busiest and most heavily trafficked areas of Ocean City, so needless to say officers rushed to pull the vehicle over as soon as possible. It seems that the actual traffic stop was effectuated without much drama, but the defendant’s alleged actions that followed were anything but calm and collected.

According to an Ocean City Police Department press release, officers detected an odor of an alcoholic beverage upon approaching the defendant, and shortly thereafter determined that he was driving on a suspended out-of-state driver’s license. The defendant was then requested to complete standardized field sobriety exercises, and was arrested after becoming uncooperative during the tests. He was initially arrested for DUI, fleeing and eluding and disorderly conduct, but it turns out these charges only represented a fraction of what was yet to come. While the defendant was seated in the backseat of the patrol vehicle, he attempted to make a phone call from his smartwatch. Making unauthorized phone calls while in custody is a huge no-no with police and correctional officers, but the defendant was not happy about giving up his watch to the police. He allegedly became aggressive and kicked the arresting officer in the face chest and arms, and then kicked another officer who came over to offer assistance. Ocean City EMS arrived on scene to treat the defendant and the officer, and the defendant was taken to Atlantic General Hospital in Berlin for treatment. After receiving treatment for what the police deemed were minor injuries, he was taken to the police station and booked for a total of 5 criminal charges including two counts of assault on a law enforcement officer, disorderly conduct and obstructing and hindering. He also received 16 traffic citations for charges including DUI and driving under the influence of drugs. The defendant faces hefty fines and potential points for aggressive driving, reckless driving and negligent driving, and according to the charges the defendant’s license was already suspended in the state of Nevada.

The defendant was denied bail by the District Court Commissioner, but granted release on a $25,000 bail the following day when he went before a judge. He posted bail and now will return to court in July for his trial date. The Blog will continue to follow this case as it progresses through the court system, and we anticipate whichever judge hears this case will not be pleased with the defendant’s alleged conduct. Aggressive driving combined with driving under the influence is a dangerous combination, especially in a crowded area such as lower Ocean City. The driving behavior combined with the alleged assault on police officers made a bad situation even worse, though the defendant may be able to challenge many of the charges in court. He certainly is going to require a strong defense to avoid jail time and permanent convictions on his record.

Continue reading →

Published on: September 16, 2020

Howard County Man Arrested for Running Woman Over

By Benjamin Herbst

Police have arrested and charged a 27-year old Prince George’s County man for allegedly hitting a woman with his car. The incident occurred in a fast food restaurant parking lot in Howard County, and most of the it was caught on the restaurant’s security cameras. The footage appears to show a woman exiting a white Audi SUV shortly before the SUV drives off. The woman walks toward a pickup truck in the parking lot, which then blocks the camera’s view of her. Less than a minute later the SUV returns to the parking lot and accelerates toward the parked pickup truck where the woman was last seen. The SUV slams into the side of the white pickup truck and then the woman again appears on camera lying down in front of the pickup truck. At first the driver of the pickup truck hastily leaves his car to avoid being injured himself, but then returns to render aid to the woman before police and EMS are called. The white SUV flees the scene at a high rate of speed shortly after striking the pickup truck.

An arrest warrant was issued for the suspect 3 days after the incident, and he was taken into custody in Washington D.C. 4 days after the arrest warrant became active. The next day he was brought before a district court judge for a bail review, but the hearing was postponed and he was held without bond until 3 days later when the he had an attorney present to argue for release. The judge was not swayed and the defendant remains in custody on charges including attempted first-degree murder, assault in the first and second degree, kidnapping and reckless endangerment. A preliminary hearing is set for the case next week, but it will likely be transferred to the Circuit Court for Howard County prior to the preliminary by way of indictment or the filing of a criminal information.

Attempted first-degree murder is the most serious offense that the defendant will face, and it is no surprise the judge decided to hold him without bail. Under Maryland law first-degree attempted murder carries a potential sentence of life in prison, while first-degree assault carries a 25-year maximum penalty and kidnapping a 20-year maximum penalty. Reckless endangerment, which is defined as engaging in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious injury to another, is a misdemeanor with a 5-year maximum penalty. While it may seem excessive to charge the defendant with attempted first-degree murder under these facts unless the victim suffered life threatening injuries, the reality is that the state is not required to prove any type of injury in a Maryland attempted murder case. All that is required is for the state to prove that the defendant intended to kill the victim, had the ability to kill the victim and took a substantial step toward killing the victim. Most attempted murder cases involve shootings and stabbings, as these acts are easy for the state to establish ability to kill and taking a substantial step toward killing, provided they can properly identify the defendant and self-defense is not an issue. Automobile attempted murder cases are less common, as it may be difficult for the state to prove the defendant actually intended to kill. While it’s to argue that a person driving an SUV at a pedestrian did not have the ability to kill, and hitting someone is certainly a substantial step, intent to kill rather than injure is not as clear. In most Maryland cases where a driver intentionally hits a person with their car the state ends up focusing on first-degree assault, where they must only prove the defendant intentionally caused or attempted to cause serious bodily injury to another.

Continue reading →

Published on: April 11, 2016

Lawmakers Look To Expand Domestic Violence Protection

By Benjamin Herbst

Today marks the final day of the 2016 General Assembly’s legislative session, and there is still much left to be decided on the criminal law front. We wrote extensively about the Justice Reinvestment Act, which has grabbed headlines for much of the last month. But there are other criminal law bills that will likely go into effect this fall, and these bills deserve some attention as well. One such bill was a measure originally taken by the House that looked to expand protections for victims of domestic violence. Currently a victim of domestic violence may petition the court for a protective order if he or she alleges that some form of abuse has taken place. Under the Maryland statute, abuse is now defined as an act that causes bodily injury or places the victim in fear of imminent bodily harm. Abuse also includes the crimes of rape, false imprisonment and stalking. Lawmakers from the House sought to expand the definition of abuse by adding harassment and malicious destruction of property but this measure failed to gain traction and was shut down after an unfavorable report by the judiciary. But now the bill has been revived in the form of an amendment to another Senate domestic violence bill, and it appears to be gaining steam.

Opponents of the amendment take issue with harassment being defined as a form of abuse. This is likely due to the broad definition of harassment, which is defined as maliciously engaging in a course conduct that alarms or seriously annoys another. No physical harm is necessary, and there is no exact definition of what a course of conduct actually means. This is a crime that while serious, is often the subject of false accusations because little objective proof is required to bring the charges; the word of the alleged victim is usually enough it initiate a case. While false accusations of harassment rarely stand up in court, they can have drastic effects on the accused if a temporary protective order is sought. Temporary protective orders can have immediate collateral consequences that can occur before the accused has his or her day in court, and this is the main reason while some lawmakers are hesitant to expand the definition of abuse to include harassment. But it appears that those in favor of expanding the abuse definition will be on the winning side of this debate.

The Blog will provide a final summary of the criminal law bills that will be heading to the governor’s desk this summer, and we will post a follow up article after all the dust settles. For now though, we expect that in October smoking marijuana in public will be a crime once again, and minimum mandatory prison sentences for drug felonies will come only at the discretion of the trial judge. Violation of probation procedures are also headed for drastic changes that will benefit defendants, and many prison inmates are looking at shorter sentences. As always, feel free to contact The Herbst Firm with any questions about these legal issues, as well as if you or a loved one has a criminal matter that calls for experienced representation. Benjamin Herbst handles all types of domestic violence cases including assault, harassment, and stalking, and is available at 410-207-2598.

Continue reading →